|
THE OLD WORLD OF HEATHCARE: Healthcare was essentially a cottage industry. The hospital was the center of the
healthcare universe. High census was critical to cash flow and profit. Most incentives
were in the wrong way and physicians and other providers "did more to make
more."
In the fee for service world of healthcare delivery, salespeople established strong
relationships, gave solid clinical messages and focused on service. Their tactical
activity had little relevance to the financial issues of healthcare
nor did it need
to! The only financial component of a representatives message consisted of head to
head price comparisons. As GPO and PBM contracts became more pervasive, financial acumen
expanded slightly to include the tactical pull through rhetoric necessary to communicate
product availability through this venue.
While these slight efforts at including some financial or business component to sales
and promotion activities may have been adequate for product positioning, they remained
detached from the financial and business issues that were emerging in the marketplace.
CHANGES IN THE BUSINESS OF HEALTHCARE:
Hospitals have become vertically and horizontally aligned systems. It is
projected that this integration will ultimately evolve into virtual integration.
Sophisticated information systems as well as the Internet will pave the way. Systems have
established unique and complex relationships with various segments of the community,
healthcare and wellness delivery in an effort to vertically integrate and offer one-stop
shopping for healthcare. These relationships are usually shrouded in payor mix
arrangements that move beyond the traditional fee for service and DRG transactions to
encompass per diem and, eventually, capitated agreements. Capitation is perhaps the single
most profound determinant of change in healthcare delivery today. Systems that are
realizing a growing trend towards capitated arrangements are more concerned with overall
outcomes within their system as opposed to the traditional fee for service fostered
"departmental budget myopia." Individual physicians have also been faced with
complex decisions regarding affiliations and the future of their financial success. While
these issues have significant impact on a salespersons product performance, for the
most part our understanding of and alignment with these issues has been irregular at best.
TRAINING TO DATE:
Most training departments deliver some level of business or financial
training for their salespeople. For the most part however, this training is provided in
the context of a particular product.
The proverbial "Managed Care" binder:
Readership, retention, and relevance are minimal here! All one need do
is think back to our high school experience and wonder how well we would do if presented
with a biology test from our old high school days. This kind of "training" just
doesnt work. The relevance to day-to-day selling is missing. Training manuals
usually have the typical glossary of terms and the overview of how managed care evolved.
Some organizations buy this commodity through the plethora of vendors offering such, or
they might create it in-house. Either way, it ends up on a shelf
usually out of date
at the time of delivery! When sales people do not see the relevance of this material to
achieving their sales goals, they will not learn from it.
This overview of the business of healthcare delivery focuses on the "what"
and not the implications. While this may be an acceptable first step in the learning
process, our findings support the fact that three crucial questions cannot be answered
after reviewing the "broad brushstroke" of information provided in managed care
overviews:
- Why is this important to me as an individual salesperson in my territory?
- How do I use this information to position my products and organization in a way that
makes sense to my customers?
- How do I help a clinician to justify a decision to a non-clinical influencer?
Pharmacoeconomics-"our loaded deck":
"We make certain that our salespeople are able to communicate
an economic benefit with all of their product presentations"
pharmaceutical
company training manager.
We are eager to impart the "formula" information on how our product performs
from an "outcomes" perspective. We arm our salespeople with this information and
some level of tutoring on how to position it and send them off! What we miss here is the
ever so important fact that our customers do not want our outcomes data. |
|
|
While many will argue that "the data at
least show the potential of the product to have a positive impact on patient outcomes, and
this is a model for the customer to consider", customers desire their own data!
Demonstrating ability to deliver a desired outcome in a capitated environment is crucial
for providers in their efforts to compete for covered lives. Outcomes data from
Inter-Mountain does not mean a thing to Harvard-Pilgrim and vice versa. Account
Manager Tutorials or "bring in the White Knight"!
National Account Managers and Regional Account Managers are often tasked
with the ad hoc duty of "bringing the troops on board with the happenings of the
marketplace." Again, while this effort may yield some level of understanding of
current issues in a market segment, status of contract negotiations and the like, it can,
to some degree remain product focused and aloof from the key business issues in the
representatives territory. In the ideal scenario, salespeople should be providing
relevant "terrain" information to the National and Regional Account managers as
opposed to the converse.
Tactical Pull Through Direction:
This is not business training. We are again arming our salespeople with
product and contract specific information for the purposes of maximizing product
acceptance and usage. We are not concerning ourselves with business issues that are
important to our constituents! While tactical pull through activities do focus on the
contractual relationships between pharmaceutical companies and providers, the focus
remains largely clinical with perhaps only a hint of pharmacoeconomic data.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVING BUSINESS AND FINICAL ACUMEN:
Hearing the Voice of the Customer
"You need to come to our side of the table"
hospital
Chief Financial Officer
There is no better way to make business and financial training relevant than to utilize
individuals who are involved in the business of healthcare. Consider establishing
relationships with the following professionals who may provide valuable insight into their
world: CEO/CFO/CIO/Medical Directors/Directors of Marketing/Provider Relations/ Managed
Care Directors. These individuals can provide a phenomenal level of insight and
information regarding the business of healthcare. Preceptorships as well as on-sight
training department discussions are two options to consider when accessing these
non-clinical influencers. The Healthcare Financial Management Association has courses on
issues in capitation. Ask a CFO about this organization or visit its website.
Training with relevant application and measurable outcomes
We need to assure that we speak to the business of healthcare, not
simply how to position our products with some "pseudo-economic add-on" to a
clinical message. Business and financial training need not be shrouded in a product
congruous message. Simply put, business training is best when it is implemented outside
the realm of product information. Training should explain how and why" the
business and financial information is relevant to both clinicians and financial
decision-makers. Otherwise, business and financial training will be futile. Understanding
the financial statement of a hospital or the process for capitated contract negotiation
can admittedly be dry and distasteful topics to many. Therefore, the crucial component of
why this is important and how it might impact the success of the salesperson is as
important as the baseline learning itself. That is why this material is best presented in
a case study or interactive format that mirrors the issues sales people face in their
accounts. When material is presented in a way that shows and impact on achieving sales
goals, participants will learn.
Salespeople also need, as a result of training, tools which will assist them in
determining where to go for business information within their markets as well as methods
to asses to what degree they are successful in gathering relevant business and financial
information and aligning their efforts correspondingly. This should include new skills
that assist the sales person in carrying on discussions with non-clinical constituents
including administrators.
Training departments need to take the lead in reviewing, revising and launching the
much-needed business training component to assure heightened effectiveness in todays
healthcare marketplace. Consider the "constant white water" of change that the
healthcare delivery world has faced in recent years. Consider now whether or not your
organization is providing training that is commensurate in content relevance to the
changes that define the new business of healthcare delivery. |